the learning never stops!

# Rules of Thumb

We long ago figured out that 3 times your altitude (in thousands) gives a nice descent from en route altitude. When the 60-to-1 gurus came out, they were convinced this was an offshoot of the flight levels to lose technique. Well it isn't, but it does work. Here's why.

Start descent at three times your altitude to lose in thousands of feet to achieve a three degree gradient.

### Definition

Start descent at three times your altitude to lose in thousands of feet to achieve a three degree gradient.

### Example

Figure: 3° Top of Descent, from Eddie's notes.

Let's say you are cruising at FL410 and are planning a descent into an airport that is just over 1,000 feet MSL elevation. So you have 40 thousand feet to lose. When should you start your descent?

### Proof

If you multiply your altitude in thousands of feet by three, you will arrive at the ideal distance to start your descent and end up with about a three degree descent gradient. We've been doing that for years. The 60-to-1 mavens will have you believe this is an offshoot of the earlier flight levels to lose technique:

$\mathrm{Gradient}=\frac{\mathrm{Flight Levels}}{\mathrm{Nautical Miles}}$

If you do the math, that would mean:

$\mathrm{Top of Descent}=\frac{\mathrm{Flight Levels}}{3}$

Figure: Top Descent trigonometry, from Eddie's notes.

That works, but that isn't the "school solution." We can verify the technique using trigonometry. We will use K to represent the altitude in thousands of feet and D for the distance in nautical miles. Of course that means the formulas will require two conversion factors:

$\mathrm{Top of Descent \left(D\right)}=\left(\frac{K}{tan\theta }\right)\left(\frac{1\mathrm{nm}}{6076\mathrm{feet}}\right)\left(\frac{1000\mathrm{feet}}{1K}\right)$

For a 3° angle, tan(θ) = 0.0524 and the math works out to:

$\mathrm{Top of Descent \left(D\right)}=\left(K\right)\left(3.14\right)$

That is an error of less than 5% from our time-tested rule of thumb.

### Book Notes

Portions of this page can be found in the book Flight Lessons 2: Advanced Flight, Chapter 11.

### Bottom Line

So what about the claims this rule of thumb is based on 60-to-1? My conclusion: It has more to do with trigonometry.

 Rule of Thumb 60-to-1? Trigonometry π Top of Descent (3°) ✓

60-to-1 — Rule of thumb is based on the mathematical relationship of a 360° circle and/or 6076' to 1 nm.

Trigonometry — Rule of thumb is based on the relationship to a right angle and the derived trigonometric functions.

π — Rule of thumb is based on the relationship of a 360° circle, the number π, and/or 6076' to 1 nm.

Top